The research is co-led by Professor Jan Schnupp from CityU’s Department of Neuroscience, and Dr Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl from the University of Freiburg. Their findings have been published in the science journal eLife, titled “Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness”.
Defects in current cochlear implant technology
People with normal hearing ability can not only effortlessly recognise different objects in the environment from the sounds they make but also localise sound, knowing the direction from which a sound is originating. This ability is called spatial hearing.
Thanks to cochlear implants, many such severely deaf patients can recover a sense of hearing and be able to have conversations with others. These bionic devices implanted into the patients’ heads can bypass the damaged inner ear hair cells and directly stimulate the nerve that links the ears to the brain with electrical pulses. “But contemporary cochlear implant technology remains far from perfect,” said Professor Schnupp. “Spatial hearing, in particular, is very poor in cochlear implant users.”
He explained that the human ear uses two mechanisms to gather information of sounds: a “place code” in which different parts of the inner ear differ in the sensitivity to particular sound frequencies, and a “timing code”, where the precise temporal pattern of nerve impulses in the auditory nerve reflect temporal properties of the incoming sounds. The sensitivity of measuring arrival time differences of sounds between the two ears, as precise as 50 microseconds, enable the spatial hearing in human. Yet this ability is often completely absent in cochlear implant users, particularly those who were born deaf and never had any normal auditory experience.
Why cochlear implants fail to detect spatial hearing
Previously, many scientists assumed that this deficit might be due to a missing input during the early development of childhood. But Professor Schnupp and his team suspected that it is more likely due to technological limitations or inappropriate trade-offs in the current cochlear implant processor design.
“Current cochlear implants try hard to deliver much ‘place information’ by delivering patterns of electrical pulses along the length of the inner ear, but they fail to exploit the remarkable temporal precision that the human ear is capable of,” he explained.
To test this hypothesis, Professor Schnupp, who has decades of experience in conducting physiological and behavioural studies of hearing in animals, teamed up with Dr Rosskothen-Kuhl from the University of Freiburg, and developed a setup to measure rats’ auditory discrimination ability behaviourally under very precisely controlled electrical stimulation.
They raised neonatally deaf rats to adulthood, and then fitted them with binaural cochlear implants and trained them to judge the perceived sound direction of very precisely timed electrical pulses to each ear. Remarkably, these deaf rats were able to learn to discriminate 50-microsecond interaural time differences. Their discrimination ability was no worse than that of normally hearing rats or humans.
Shed light on the design of the cochlear implant
Professor Schnupp pointed out that it is the first study demonstrating that, at least in rats, severely degraded auditory experience in early development does not inevitably lead to impaired binaural time processing in adulthood. These results imply that with appropriate attention to the coordination of stimuli presented through the two implants, it should be possible for people with implants to learn to localise sounds accurately.
Professor Schnupp believed that the lack of a technological breakthrough in improving cochlear implants to provide the full richness of natural hearing is due to cochlear implant manufacturers having long underestimated how exquisitely sensitive human ears are to the temporal pattern. Their study has proved there is a real chance of substantial benefits with a new design direction, at least in animal models.
He added that this study is only a first step in a long series of studies which they have planned, and the team predicted that the findings will in due course transform the design of cochlear implant processors and provide a much richer auditory experience to users of “bionic ears” to overcome deafness.
Professor Schnupp and Dr Rosskothen-Kuhl are the corresponding authors of the paper. Dr Rosskothen-Kuhl and Alexa N Buck from Department of Biomedical Sciences (currently at the University of Freiburg) are the co-first authors. The other co-author is Li Kongyan from CityU’s Department of Electrical Engineering.
The research received funding support from Hong Kong General Research Fund, Health and Medical Research Fund, Shenzhen Science and Innovation Fund, and the German Academic Exchange Service.
DOI number: 10.7554/eLife.59300