Noise and light pollution alter bird mating behaviour

It’s not only climate change impacting bird reproduction.

Fledgling chicks of the Pacific-slope flycatcher, whose breeding success rate was reduced due to noise (Photo: Masayuki Senzaki).

Some bird species change their reproductive behaviours in response to noise and light pollution, according to a study published in the journal Nature. The findings raise new questions about how responses to sensory stimuli, like noise and light, interact with other global changes, like a warming climate. 

An international team of researchers, including Hokkaido University ecologist Masayuki Senzaki, wanted to develop a better understanding of the effects of human-made noise and light pollution on reproductive success in birds. Scientific understanding in this area is currently limited to a few species at the local scale. The team used citizen-gathered records between 2000 and 2014 on more than 58,500 nests belonging to 142 bird species across the United States and assessed how this information was associated with high-resolution noise and light data from the nesting areas.

The scientists found that reproductive behaviours in bird species living in more closed woodland habitats were more significantly impacted by noise and light pollution compared to bird species living in more open grasslands and wetlands.

Specifically, light pollution was associated with earlier egg laying in both open and closed habitat species. Also, closed habitat species living in well-lit areas produced 16% larger egg clutches than those living in darker areas. The scientists think this is due to longer foraging times available to birds in well-lit areas.

Distribution map of artificial noise in the United States. The shade of color indicates the magnitude of noise. The points in the figure are the positions of the bird nests used in the analysis. Red indicates a nest that failed to breed, and black indicates a nest that succeeded in breeding (Masayuki Senzaki, et al. Nature. November 11, 2020).

Closed habitat species were negatively impacted by noise pollution, with evidence of reduced clutch sizes, increased hatching failure and fewer offspring capable of flight.

Further analyses at the species level showed that birds with low frequency birdsong were more negatively affected by noise pollution than those with higher frequency vocals. Notably, many closed habitat species chirp in low frequencies. The scientists believe that noise pollution masks these lower frequencies, interfering with male stimulation of females and thus their receptivity to breeding.

Also, species that see well in low-lit conditions laid eggs earlier in response to light pollution. The scientists expected they would have less nesting success compared to birds who do not see as well in low-lit conditions, due to a mismatch between peak food availability and food need. Instead, they found the birds had better nesting success. The scientists think this is due to their ability to successfully track available resources as climate temperatures rise. 

“There is widespread consensus that climate change is causing temperate birds to reproduce earlier,” says Senzaki. “But our data is showing that the impacts usually attributed to temperature could be overestimated, due to being confounded by the impacts of light pollution. Similarly, delays in the onset of bird breeding due to exposure to noise pollution could be leading to the underestimation of the impacts of climate change.” The team recommends data re-evaluations to understand how the different elements of global change interact to impact bird reproduction behaviours worldwide.

Published: 02 Feb 2021

Institution:

Contact details:

Global Relations Office

Kita 8, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo
060-0808 Hokkaido
JAPAN

+81-11-706-2185
Country: 
Journal:
Academic discipline: 
Content type: 
Reference: 

Masayuki Senzaki, et al. Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature. November 11, 2020.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7

Funding information:

This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF; 1414171, 1556177, 1556192, 1812280), the NASA Ecological Forecasting Grant (NNX17AG36G), and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (17J00646).