Fig. 1 Schematic oxygen reduction reaction activity comparison of Cu2O polyhedral catalysts on CNT matrix.
Can the shape of a crystal really change how well it performs in clean energy technology? A new study says yes—decisively. Researchers from National Taiwan University, National Tsing Hua University, and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University have discovered that the performance of a widely studied catalyst, cuprous oxide (Cu2O), in oxygen reduction reactions (ORR) depends heavily on which crystal face is exposed.
Oxygen reduction is a central reaction in fuel cells, which are devices that convert chemical energy into electricity. Platinum is commonly used in this role but is expensive and limited in supply. Cu2O, a more affordable alternative, has now shown surprising potential—if used with the right shape.
The team synthesized Cu₂O crystals into three distinct shapes: cubes, octahedra, and rhombic dodecahedra. These shapes expose different crystal facets—{100}, {111}, and {110}, respectively—and were each blended with carbon nanotubes to enhance conductivity. The researchers found that the rhombic dodecahedron version, exposing the {110} surface, delivered the strongest catalytic activity for ORR, while the cube was most stable over time.
Fig. 2 SEM images of Cu2O (a) cubes, (b) octahedra, and (c) rhombic dodecahedra mixed with carbon nanotubes. (d) Normalized LSV polarization curves for the ORR using different catalysts. (e) Chronoamperometric curves for the Cu2O/CNTs catalysts measured at 0.65 V vs. RHE in an O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution. Free energy diagram for oxygen reduction on Cu2O {100}, {110}, and {111} surfaces with (f) U = 0 V and (g) U = 1.23 V. (h) 2D volcano plot for the oxygen reduction reaction. The theoretical limiting potential represents the ORR activity.
By combining advanced quantum simulations with lab experiments, the team found that oxygen molecules behave differently depending on which crystal surface they land on. The {110} surface showed the weakest grip on oxygen, which helps the reaction proceed more smoothly. This matched their density functional theory (DFT) predictions and was clearly shown in free energy diagrams and 2D volcano plots that link binding strength to catalytic performance.
However, better performance sometimes comes at a cost. The rhombic dodecahedron crystals were found to degrade faster during operation, possibly due to self-oxidation. In contrast, the cube-shaped crystals—though less reactive—were more robust over time.
This research not only helps explain why different facets perform differently but also opens doors to designing next-generation, low-cost catalysts by simply controlling crystal shapes.
"By fine-tuning the geometry of crystal surfaces, we can tailor their reactivity and stability, which is crucial for advancing sustainable energy technologies," said Prof. Jyh-Pin Chou of National Taiwan University.
Prof. Jyh-Pin Chou’s email address: [email protected]
