UPDATE: In science we trust

Scientific advances can stimulate the economy and are behind many of today’s top political issues, but how does the scientifically literate public feel about science?

News: In science we trust (Nature pp 388-389, Scientific American pp 56-59)

Scientific advances can stimulate the economy and are behind many of today’s top political issues, but how does the scientifically literate public feel about science? Scientific American and Nature teamed up to find out, with a survey that drew responses from 21,000 readers around the world.

The questions covered subjects ranging from trust in scientists and whether they should get involved in politics to spending on research. Distinctions became apparent between the United States and Europe in terms of attitudes to technologies; these are highlighted in the Scientific American article.

Only 18% of US respondents wish to phase out nuclear power, compared with 66% of European respondents, and only 13% of US respondents are concerned about the risks associated with genetically modified crops, compared with 27% of Europeans. But just 8% of respondents across the whole geographical range would disapprove of embryo research under any circumstances.

Nature’s feature focuses on the striking differences between the responses from east Asia and those from the rest of the world. For example, a startling 35% of Japanese respondents and nearly 50% of Chinese respondents agreed that there is “reason for doubt” about evolutionary theory’s ability to explain the variety of species on Earth. In contrast, the numbers for the rest of the world fluctuated around 10%. Japanese and Chinese respondents were also less likely than others to say that they trust scientific explanations for the origins of the Universe. And almost a third of scientifically literate Chinese people say that scientists should stay out of politics, compared with around 10% in most of the rest of the world.

Contact
For more details please contact the press office

News Feature: Making the cut (pp 383-385)

Research careers are made or broken by the decisions of grant-funding committees — but normally these take place behind closed doors. This week, Nature provides a rare glimpse of the tensions, agonies and battles at a grant-review meeting after securing access to a panel at the American Cancer Society, the largest private non-profit funder of cancer research in the United States.

Senior reviewers say that when the success rate drops, as it has in many major funding bodies in recent years, the review process starts to fall apart, and reviewers feel forced into making impossible choices between equally worthy proposals. Kendall Powell reports on those tough decisions, and finds out what it really takes to make the cut.

Author contact
Helen Pearson (Chief Features Editor, Nature, New York)
Tel: +1 212 726 9340
E-mail: [email protected]

News: Boom and bust strands Pakistan’s universities (pp 378-379)

After devastating floods, Pakistan’s dreams of developing a world-class higher-education system hang in the balance. A Nature investigation has found that many research projects are on hold, and the Higher Education Commission fears that the worse may be yet to come. Supporters say that a decade’s worth of strong growth could be lost if government support and international aid are not forthcoming. But critics say that much of the funding received during the 2000s led to waste and corruption on campus.

Nature’s reporters in Karachi and London detail the problems now facing the system, and an accompanying Editorial calls for continued support for higher education in Pakistan.

Author contact
Geoff Brumfiel (Senior Reporter, Nature, London)
Tel: +44 20 7843 4645
E-mail: [email protected]

PRESS CONTACTS…

From North America and Canada
Neda Afsarmanesh, Nature New York
Tel: +1 212 726 9231
E-mail: [email protected]

From Japan, Korea, China, Singapore and Taiwan
Mika Nakano, Nature Tokyo
Tel: +81 3 3267 8751
E-mail: [email protected]

From the UK
Rebecca Walton, Nature, London
Tel: +44 20 7843 4502
E-mail: [email protected]

About Nature Publishing Group (NPG):

Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is a publisher of high impact scientific and medical information in print and online. NPG publishes journals, online databases and services across the life, physical, chemical and applied sciences and clinical medicine.

Focusing on the needs of scientists, Nature (founded in 1869) is the leading weekly, international scientific journal. In addition, for this audience, NPG publishes a range of Nature research journals and Nature Reviews journals, plus a range of prestigious academic journals including society-owned publications. Online, nature.com provides over 5 million visitors per month with access to NPG publications and online databases and services, including Nature News and NatureJobs plus access to Nature Network and Nature Education’s Scitable.com.

Scientific American is at the heart of NPG’s newly-formed consumer media division, meeting the needs of the general public. Founded in 1845, Scientific American is the oldest continuously published magazine in the US and the leading authoritative publication for science in the general media. Together with scientificamerican.com and 15 local language editions around the world it reaches over 3 million consumers and scientists. Other titles include Scientific American Mind and Spektrum der Wissenschaft in Germany.

Throughout all its businesses NPG is dedicated to serving the scientific and medical communities and the wider scientifically interested general public. Part of Macmillan Publishers Limited, NPG is a global company with principal offices in London, New York and Tokyo, and offices in cities worldwide including Boston, Buenos Aires, Delhi, Hong Kong, Madrid, Barcelona, Munich, Heidelberg, Basingstoke, Melbourne, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul and Washington DC. For more information, please go to www.nature.com.

Published: 22 Sep 2010

Contact details:

The Macmillan Building, 4 Crinan Street
London
N1 9XW
United Kingdom

+44 20 7833 4000
Country: 
Journal:
News topics: 
Content type: 
Websites: